Fabio Borini Wants Out

According to his agent, Fabio Borini wants to leave the club.
That's interesting, because last year, when no-one except Sunderland and QPR wanted to buy him, Borini was telling us that he wanted to, er, stay and fight for his place. That after his agent was bleating how Liverpool blocked his loan move to Inter, yet prior to that was claiming Fabio was not looking to leave.

Fabio demonstrating his prowess in front of goal...

Call me a cynic, but at the end of last season, Liverpool had just finished second in the League and he was on a nice contract, so why would he want to move? Now we've finished in 6th place, with Borini contributing practically nothing all year, and suddenly he wants out.
(Strangely, Alberto Aquilani was another Italian player with a schizophrenic agent. One minute he was telling the World that Alberto was totally committed to the club—and surely it was just a coincidence that no-one else wanted to sign him at the time—only to turn around and tout him to the world as soon as any interest was shown.)
Borini was Rodgers' first Liverpool signing, and not a particularly auspicious one: a sign of things to come with a price tag of £11M. I very much doubt that anyone will be crazy enough to offer the £14M that Sunderland were prepared to cough up last year, so that will be more transfer kitty money down the toilet.
Time to cut our losses and get rid of this important player.

Squad Rotation Considered Harmful

Bill Shankly famously used to quip, when asked what his side was for a forthcoming game: "It's the same as last season." Indeed, when Liverpool won the league in 1965/66—Shankly's second title—he used only 14 players. Even more remarkably, one of them played in only 1 game, while another made only 5 appearances.
Of course, back then, teams could name only a single substitute, who might or might not be used. (In fact, prior to the 1965/66 season, no substitutes were allowed!) Also, the top division contained 22 teams, instead of today's 20, so that a full league season was 42 games, not 38. That season, Liverpool also competed in the FA Cup, the UEFA Cup Winner's Cup and the FA Charity Shield (they were FA Cup winners for the first time in the 1964/65 season). That season, they also reached the final of the now defunct Cup Winner's Cup where they lost in the final to Borussia Dortmund. (They did not participate in the Football League Cup that year.) I mention this because the pro-squad rotation brigade love to point out how many fixtures teams play each year, and how tired players get. What a load of, er, poppycock!
Fact: Shankly's 1965/66 championship-winning team played 53 games that season, compared to Rodger's 2014/15 7th placed side playing 58. Not a huge difference, particularly when you bear in mind that Rodgers is able to play 3 substitutes each game, while Shanks was limited to just the one.
It must be accepted that injuries and disciplinary suspensions play a big part in team selection. Shankly was lucky that injuries didn't play too big a role in his season, but he probably made sure that his players' discipline—historically, always a Liverpool strong-point—wasn't too big a factor. But why didn't he use more players anyway? It wasn't as if Liverpool had a small squad. The simple answer is that, back then, the Liverpool management's philosophy, as it was just about everywhere else at the time, was summed-up by the old adage that you never change a winning team.
Like many football clichés, there's an amazing amount of wisdom contained in those few words.

That Stoke Game...

I've held off from writing anything about the 6-1 trashing at the hands of Stoke City for a while. I was hoping to be able to calm down and put things into some kind of perspective, but, well, I guess time may not be such a great healer after all.

Charlie Adam and Peter Crouch, celebrate a win over their former side.

Talking of time, this was the worst Liverpool defeat in my lifetime, which goes back rather longer than I would care to admit. All of which makes it particularly unfortunate that it should be Stevie G's last game for us. He deserved far, far better.
Aside from the score, there were a number of elements to this match that left me perplexed.